baby兄言之有理，就是纯好奇，体验看看
本帖由安卓客户端发布

这镜子真是冷门
我觉得国际市场销售的望远镜，售价基本就可以判断档次了，个别型号除外

不好意思，手抖了。  是7x50.

评价相比于其价格高的意外的一只镜子，中国产，最大的缺陷是透光率低，主要是因为比较复杂的目镜设计

Vanguard Endeavor ED II10x42Several years ago the Vanguard company launched a series of binoculars called the Endeavor ED, consisting of five roof prism models with the following parameters: 8x32, 8x42, 10x42, 8.5x44 and 10.5x44. That series hardly managed to impact the market properly and the producer already decided to launch its successor, the Endeavor ED II models. In 2014 you could observe the presentation of three devices: the 8x32, the 8x42 and the10x42. So far both series, the older and the newer, have been available in shops and the price difference between them amounts to just several hundred PLN.
The binoculars are very similar to each other, differing in merely cosmetic casing details and coatings – those used in Vanguards ED II seem to be more efficient, with lower intensity, providing more natural colours. If you buy one of the Vanguard Endeavor ED II pairs of binoculars you get a very rich accessory kit: the caps for objectives and eyepieces, a strap, a very stylish, profiled case, with a separate strap and a possibility to attach it to your belt and an optics cleaning cloth. The case is the proof that the Vanguard company have a lot of experience when it comes to producing bags or cases – it can be an example to follow for other optics producers.

It is also worth mentioning that the Endeavors come with lifetime warranty both on Polish and American markets.

Real front lens diameter Left:   42+/- 0.05 mm
Right:  42+/- 0.05 mm 8 / 8.0 pkt
Real magnification 10.13+/- 0.05x 3/3.0
Transmission 79.9+/- 1.5% 9/15.0
Chromatic aberration Low in the centre, a bit higher than medium on the edge. 6.8/10.0
Astigmatism Low. 8/10.0
Distortion The distance between the first curved line and the field centre compared to the field of view radius: 95% ± 3% 10/10.0
Coma Appears only in a distance of 80% of the field of view radius and is between low and medium on the very edge. 8.4/10.0
Blurring at the edge of the FOV The blur occurs in a distance of 99% ± 2% from the field of view centre. 10/10.0
Darkening at the edge the FOV Negligible. 4.4/5.0
Whiteness of the image Just more than a dozen percent of difference in transmission between red and blue makes the images a bit yellowish 2.7/5.0
Collimation Perfect. 5/5.0
Internal reflections
Left: Right:
Vanguard Endeavor ED II 10x42 - Internal reflections - Left Vanguard Endeavor ED II 10x42 - Internal reflections - Right Very nice! Dark area around the pupils. 4.4/5.0
Housing Solid, the "open hinge" design. Rubber armour of a very good quality. Nothing creaks or sticks out. Rubber eyecups with four degrees of regulation. Produced in China. 8/8.0
Focusing A big and comfortable central wheel covered with fine ribbing. Running through the whole range takes a turn through about 280 degrees. The wheel moves smoothly and is well-damped. A sliding ring on the right eyepiece for individual focusing which moves the element. One thing you can carp about here is that ribbing on the wheel and the ring – definitely too fine and not especially nice under the fingers. 4.3/5.0
Tripod There is an exit but far from the mass centre. 2/3.0
Interpupilary distance from 58.3 to 74mm 5/6.0
Closest focusing distance 1.45 m 2/2.0
Eyepieces FOV Apparent field of view of 65.4 degrees. 8/10.0
Field of view Measured by us amounted to about 6.46 +/- 0.04 degrees and it was in full accordance with the specifications. A huge field for this class of equipment. 7/8.0
Quality of the interior of the barrels Tubes are darkened and baffled very well. The bottom is black but slightly shiny. A very small amount of dust. 4.3/5.0
Vignetting
Left: Right:
Vanguard Endeavor ED II 10x42 - Vignetting - Left Vanguard Endeavor ED II 10x42 - Vignetting - Right OL: 0.1%, OR: 0.5%. 6/8.0
Prisms quality Good quality BaK-4. 8/8.0
Antireflection coatings Green-purple on objectives, greenish on eyepieces and prisms. Medium intensity. 4.5/5.0
Warranty [years] lifetime 6/6.0
Final result           85.2% 144.8 / 170 pkt
Econo result 0pkt.

SUMMARY

Pros:
solid casing,
wide field of view,
slight chromatic aberration,
low astigmatism,
excellent distortion control,
very low coma,
sharp image across the whole field of view,
low brightness loss on the edge of the field of view,
circular exit pupils on a black background,
good quality prisms made of BaK-4 glass,
sharp image already from a distance of 1.45 metres,
very good darkening and cleanliness inside the tubes,
lifetime warranty period,
brilliant price/quality and price/possibilities ratios.

Cons:
too low transmission level at this price point.

To be honest I can barely believe my own eyes. I knew that the tested pair of binoculars might be a very good instrument, it was enough I spend several moments with it to assess roughly its possibilities. I had an opportunity to play with the Endeavor ED II binoculars during our Rally; I was sure they all were very well done, the 10x magnification model appearing to be the best of the group. Now the total result of all categories confirmed that initial impression – the tested device’s final score is simply brilliant, especially if you take into account the fact that you deal here with a pair of binoculars produced in China which cost just about 500 Euro.

In fact the only flaw you can find is the transmission graph, presented below.

Already while testing the Endeavor ED II 8x32 we complained a bit in this category. Here the eyepiece design is even more complex so the transmission is also a bit worse – a result of about 80% is simply unbecoming at this price point.

You can say that transmission slip-up is the only chance the Vanguard’s rivals get. A better, flatter transmission graph would raise the final score by several points and the binoculars would be on a level of 150 points, so far only available for the top-of-the-range devices, of the best quality and the most accessible prices.

Vanguard Endeavor ED II binoulars.

You can say the Vanguard has definitely stirred things up on the market - and rightly so. Let the leading producers think a bit about their moves; after all the prices of 10x42 binoculars amounting to over 2000 Euro hardly reflect their content, which is absurd.

几年前，先锋公司推出了一系列名为“奋进”的双筒望远镜，由5个屋顶棱镜模型组成，其参数如下:8x32、8x42、10x42、8.5x44和10.5x44。这个系列几乎没有成功地影响市场，生产商已经决定推出它的继任者，努力的II型。在2014年，你可以看到三个设备的展示:8x32、8x42和10x42。到目前为止，这两款产品都已经在商店里买到，而且价格相差只有几百个。
双筒望远镜非常相似，不同的只是表面的外壳细节和涂层——在前卫的ED II中使用的似乎更有效率，强度更低，提供更自然的颜色。如果你买的一个先锋努力ED二世对双筒望远镜得到一个非常富有的辅助工具:目标和目镜的帽子,皮带,非常时尚,异形的情况下,一个单独的带,可能将它附加到你的腰带和一个光学清洁布。这个案例证明了先锋公司在生产包装袋或箱子方面有丰富的经验——它可以成为其他光学制造商的榜样。
值得一提的是，这些努力在波兰和美国市场都有终身保修。
实际前镜头直径左:42+/- 0.05 mm。
右:42+/- 0.05 mm 8 / 8.0 pkt。
真正的放大率10.13+/- 0.05x3 /3.0。
传输79.9 9/15.0 + / - 1.5%
中间色差低，边缘稍高于中等。6.8/10.0
散光low. 8/10.0
将第一个曲线与场中心之间的距离与视场半径的距离进行比较:95% 3% 10/10.0。
昏迷仅出现在视野范围内80%的视野范围内，且处于非常边缘的低和中。8.4/10.0
模糊在fov的边缘模糊发生在99%的距离从视野中心的视野。10/10.0
在边缘处的阴影处，fov是无效的。4.4/5.0。
图像的白度仅仅是红色和蓝色之间传输差异的百分之十几，使得图像有点黄。
准直perfect. 5/5.0
内部反射
左,右:
先锋奋进号II 10x42 -内反射-左前锋奋进II 10x42 -内反射-对非常好!瞳孔周围的暗区。4.4/5.0
坚固的外壳，“开放式铰链”的设计。橡胶甲质量很好。没有什么东西会吱吱作响或伸出来。橡胶镜片有四度调节。生产的千8/8.0
把一个大而舒适的※※轮毂盖上细纹。在整个范围内跑步大约需要280度。轮子移动得很平稳，很有阻尼。右目镜上的一个滑动环，用于移动元件的个别聚焦。你可以在这里吹毛求疵的是，在车轮和戒指上的摆动——绝对太好了，在手指下面不是特别好。4.3/5.0
三脚架有一个出口，但远离大众中心。2/3.0
瞳距从58.3到74mm /6.0。
最近的聚焦距离是1.45 m /2.0。
目镜视场65.4度。8/10.0
我们测量的视场大约是6.46 +/- 0.04度，完全符合规格。这是这类设备的一个巨大的领域。7/8.0
桶形管内部的质量变得很暗，而且很容易被压坏。底部是黑色的，但有点光泽。非常小的灰尘。4.3/5.0
渐晕
左,右:
先锋奋进II 10x42 - Vignetting -左先锋奋进II 10x42 - Vignetting -右OL: 0.1%， OR: 0.5%。6/8.0
质量好，质量好。8/8.0
抗反射涂层的绿色-紫色的目标，绿色在目镜和棱镜。中等强度。4.5/5.0
保修(年)6/6.0一生
最终结果85.2% 144.8 / 170 pkt。
0pkt经济结果。
总结
优点:
固体外壳,
宽视野,
轻微的色差,
低的散光,
优秀的变形控制,
非常低的昏迷,
在整个视野中清晰的图像，
低亮度损失在视野边缘，
黑色背景的圆形出口瞳孔，
良好的质量棱镜由BaK-4玻璃制成，
清晰的图像已经从1.45米的距离，
管子内部的暗度和清洁度非常好，
终身保修期内,
卓越的价格/质量和价格/可能性比率。
缺点:
在这个价位上，传输水平太低。
老实说，我几乎不敢相信自己的眼睛。我知道，经过测试的双筒望远镜可能是一种很好的仪器，我花了很多时间来评估它的可能性。在我们的※※上，我有机会和我的望远镜一起玩。我确信他们都做得很好，10倍的放大模型看起来是最好的。现在所有分类的结果都证实了最初的印象——经过测试的设备的最终成绩是非常出色的，特别是如果你考虑到你在这里使用的是一副在中国生产的双筒望远镜，成本仅为500欧元。
事实上，你能找到的唯一的缺陷就是传输图，如下所示。
在测试的过程中，我们在这一类别中抱怨了一点。这里的目镜设计更加复杂，所以传输也更糟糕——80%的结果只是在这个价格点上不合适。
你可以说，这是先锋的对手获得的唯一机会。一个更好的，更平坦的传输图将会把最后的分数提高几个点，而双筒望远镜将会达到150分，目前为止只适用于顶级的设备，最好的质量和最易接近的价格。
先锋队努力争取二人。
你可以说，先锋队肯定在市场上掀起了波澜——这是理所应当的。让主要生产者考虑一下他们的行动;在10x42双筒望远镜的价格超过2000欧元之后，它们的内容几乎没有反映出来，这是荒谬的。

尼康的8x30和胜途的830ed比起来会好多少？另外没用过25或者20这类小口径的，如果不考虑晚上用，只是白天用效果可以达到30口径的成像素质吗？
本帖由安卓客户端发布

现在尼康的7x50和10x50旗舰是WX了，不过更重，而且非常昂贵。

大哥，倍率 型号都错了...........
再说了这玩意又大又重，视场又窄，不太适合楼主这样的新人

富士有款8x32不知如何
本帖由安卓客户端发布

不介意重的话，可以找找尼康的8X50 SP 价格稍稍有点超标，不过富士的sw没问题。这可都是顶级保罗了，咸鱼上偶尔有货。

非常中肯的建议。不知8x25ed或者20ed这种规格日常白天看景如何，确实便携很多。
本帖由安卓客户端发布

papilio 6.5x21不太适合看风景

主要是有两点

一是视场角窄

二是可能光学设计的问题，观远景时感觉画面稍微有点点“肉”，似乎缺少一些明快的感受

还有这个镜密封不好，完全不防水，也比较容易进灰

现在西光有一款6x18的，标称最近对焦距离也达到0.5m，有防水防尘设计，尺寸和外形也更紧凑，重量很轻

价格比papilio便宜一半还多

但是外观就裸露着注塑的表面，颜色只有粉蓝和粉红

还有就是没有类似papilio那样的近焦补偿设计

当对焦距离很近时，双目视场难以重合，会造成一定的不适感，也会影响到可感成像范围

镜无完镜

但个人觉得papilio 21目前确实还没有其他望远镜可以取代

值得一试

精英除了做工，光学连三大二线都比不上

谢谢推荐，不知裕众MS10*50系列相比博冠鸿鹄如何
本帖由安卓客户端发布

胜间
本帖由安卓客户端发布

貌似不错，关注下。
本帖由安卓客户端发布