总结一下： 基本上，安全专家认为，从安全角度看，w7 技术上更先进，苹果稍微落后。
市场份额来说，苹果也许受到更少攻击。
两种OS 都已经相对成熟。

http://www_tomshardware_com/news/pc-windows-apple-mac-osx,9557.html

    Paul Kocher, president and chief scientist at Cryptography Research: "The fair answer is that with the latest versions of each operating system there isn't a compelling security reason to pick one or the other. It used to be that Apple was doing a better job, but with Windows 7 Microsoft has caught up. There are some differences; Windows has a better security ecosystem. On the other hand, Apple tends to have more expensive hardware and has a smaller market share, so it attracts fewer malware writers. Both have security bugs. Both need patches. Both can be broken if someone finds a zero-day exploit."

    Charlie Miller, a principal analyst at consultancy Independent Security Evaluators: "Technologically speaking, PCs are a little more secure than Macs. Macs have a larger attack surface out of the box (Flash, Java, support for a million file formats, etc.) and lack some anti-exploitation technologies found in PCs like full ASLR [Address Space Layout Randomization]. This means Macs have more vulnerabilities and it's easier to turn a vulnerability into an exploit on the platform. Despite the fact it is less secure, paradoxically, Macs are actually safer to use for most people. This is because there simply isn't much risk of being exploited or installing malware.

    "This safeness is purely a function of market share. Since Macs are only around 10 percent of computers out there, and it takes just as much effort for bad guys to write malware or exploits, they tend to spend all of their time targeting PCs. In other words, despite the fact that Macs are less secure than PCs, if you give one teenager a Mac and another a PC and come back in a month, the odds are the Mac will have no problems and the PC will be infected with malware. At some point the market share of Macs will reach a threshold to interest attackers, and then things will quickly turn bad for Mac users."

    Rich Mogull, CEO at Securosis: "It depends on which version of Windows we're talking about. Clearly there are major differences between Windows XP and Windows 7. Second is, are we talking about safety versus security? Microsoft has done more in terms of its inherent security features than Apple has in the operating system. All of that said, Microsoft gets attacked a lot more than Apple does. Right now your odds of being infected as a Mac user by malicious software are quite a bit lower than a Windows user, unless you do stupid things, such as download free versions of commercial software. And some of the pornography sites on the Internet, the dark corners of the Internet have stuff that will hurt a Mac.

    "But I want to give Microsoft credit because the more advanced features they put into their operating system are superior to what Apple has done. It's really a balance because there's little motivation for Apple to do more at this time. The Mac OS has got some holes in there that Microsoft has closed down. But since it's attacked less there is less motivation for Apple to close the gap."

    Tyler Reguly, senior security research engineer at nCircle: "If you believe the hype and the flashy commercials the answer would be Mac. But if you take a look at the two platforms, and the mindsets of the companies behind them then the PC wins hands down. If you compare Windows 7 to Snow Leopard, then the simple winner is Windows 7. Microsoft brought in teams of security professionals to look at their code and find problems leading to a more secure product while Apple is often criticized for ignoring issues.

    "The idea of the consumer being protected due to lack of market share is fairly obtuse, as more people buy into the product and market share grows, targeted attacks will grow as well. You also have to consider that Microsoft has a patch program in place that provides patches and updates on a more regular basis than Apple, this is something that the consumer should care about, as should they care about the plethora of PC security products that exist.

    "The big risk is client side attacks and most of that could be prevented by using adequate software on the desktop, along with common sense while surfing. Until consumers can learn to do this on a regular basis it won't matter if they are running a Mac or a PC...they'll be at risk."

我又看了一下回帖，据说是根据这个测试： http://www_pcbeta_com/html/92/n-592.html

看了之后就更糊涂啦

唉。。。。。继续搬吧

前清的※※资料要不要帮你翻翻？

内牛满面，就是就是，狂点头。。。。

https://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=689516

这个太牛了。。。

有第三方的little snitch

随便其实，民用的东西不要指望太多。个人认为在普通用户的系统里，麦金塔相对安全些，因为毕竟针对麦金塔的病毒要少很多。微软还是树大招风

呵呵，可见你对苹果的了解是多么贫乏

ARD就是开源VNC的包装版，其他问题无法一一作答了，我最早用的是32k内存的Apple iie。

http://ria_richtechmedia_com/2008/06/19/%E7%82%BA%E4%BD%95-windows-remote-desktop-connecton-rdc-%E9%80%9F%E5%BA%A6%E9%80%99%E9%BA%BC%E5%BF%AB%EF%BC%9F/

最后BS一下buenas这位泡菜

每次有mac vs win的贴子，你必进来显摆一翻，然后每次都必定搬出所谓的企业理论来

不过无所谓，我会捍卫你显摆装B的权利，我也有回帖BS的权利

嗯，这话好。

我要印在我电脑的Win图标下面，每天早中晚诵读三遍。信则灵，保证不中毒不死机。

我对这种所谓的“企业应用”很憎恶，哈哈，所以没有涉猎，也许http://www.apple.com/business/solutions/it/能有所帮助。

这论坛又不是企业信息化论坛，一味地强调所谓的企业只能令人反感。

说起来这些有可能只是你不知道而已。

最见不得开口企业闭口企业却躲在背后借口安全保密远程管理窥视别人电脑隐私的人。

远程部署，呵呵，Mac的桌面共享还是要赞一个。

显摆那些服务器有啥意思……

作为普通用户，日常应用中，用Mac不必在病毒和杀毒软件上花费精力，安心上网，这就够了。