翻译一篇亚马逊D800的评价
亚马逊现在D800一共12个评价。10个5星。一个4星。1个一星，一星这个是因为给他送要延迟到六月，他生气了，然后说拿到机器之后再改。翻译这篇因为这个人同时买了5D3 和 D800 用了几周后把5D3 退了（1个月之内包退政策），他用对比的方式写下了对这两台机器的评价。我就直接一段一段翻译了，因为英语水平有限，翻译的不好的地方大家也可以直接对比一下。
这是原帖地址
http://www_amazon_com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AALUG4QUQJ3UL/ref=cm_cr_pr_auth_rev?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview

Unbiased Review of 5DmkIII vs D800, April 4, 2012
5D3 vs D800
By
Se
作者 Se

This review is from: Nikon D800 36.3 MP CMOS FX-Format Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) (Electronics)
I'm a Sony shooter with only a few lenses. I use to shoot Canon during the film days. I tested both the Canon 5D mkIII and the Nikon D800 and here are my results. I tested a 5DmkIII with a 24-70 f2.8 lens and a Nikon D800 (not D800e) with a 24-70 f2.8 lens.
我是一个索尼的使用者有很少几个镜头。我过去常用Canon来拍摄电影。我这次同时使用了5D3和D800，下面是我的评价。我试用的镜头是Canon的24-70 F2.8 和 Nikon 的 24-70 F2.8

High ISO:
About the same, except D800 has a lot more detail to work with. In Lightroom, I can save a higher percentage of ISO 6400 shots because the D800 has more detail. Canon seems cleaner initially in Lightroom but when the picture fits into a 24" 1920x1080 monitor or a 64" Samsung plasma TV, the Nikon looks a tad cleaner, noise less noticeable. I think the Canon looks cleaner in Lightroom because it is just a smaller picture. But displaying ISO 6400 shots on a monitor or TV, Nikon looks nicer in general. Both cameras at ISO 12,800 look awful and not recoverable in Lightroom. It might look acceptable as a really small pic but why the heck would you buy an expensive camera to display crappy looking pictures?
高ISO
基本上是一样的。除了D800有更多的细节。在lightroom里，我会保存D800更多在ISO6400情况下拍摄的图片，因为它有着更丰富的细节。最初佳能的照片在lightroom中看起来更清晰，但是当照片放大到24寸 1920*1080 在 我64寸的三星电视上看的时候，D800的图片还是稍微清楚一点，并且噪点少一点的。我个人认为佳能在lightroom中看起来清楚是因为照片尺寸比较小，但是把用ISO6400的照片放到电视上看，普遍情况下Nikon好一点。这两台相机在ISO12,800的时候成像都很差，并且不可以再lightroom中修复，也许很小尺寸的照片在这么高的ISO条件下还是可以接受的，但是为什么要买这么贵的相机还拍这种小照片呢？

Frames per second:
Easy winner. Canon can shoot 6 FPS, Nikon 4 FPS. However, in practice I think 4 FPS is pretty good. None of these cameras are really Olympic style sports cameras.
连拍
胜负显而易见。佳能6张每秒，尼康4张每秒。但是，是实践中，我觉得4张每秒已经很不错了。不是所有的相机都像奥林巴斯那样专做运动相机

Resolution:
Easy winner. Nikon's RAW files are more detailed, almost 3D like. I can't really explain it other than the pictures look more real. I can crop a photo to 1/3 it's size (12 megapixels) and it still looks stunning. I wonder how much better the D800e version is. I'll have to wait until my friend receives his to find out.
分辨率
胜负显而易见。尼康的RAW格式充满了细节，就像3D那样。我不能解释到底有多逼真，但是就算我把相片裁到只有3分之一的尺寸（1200万像素）他还是让人吃惊的号。我好奇D800E能做到多好，我会等到我的朋友收到他预定的D800e 然后再来进行比较。

JPEG:
Easy winner. Out of the camera, the Canon JPEGs are phenomenal. The processing done is quite remarkable.

JPEG格式的照片。
显而易见的胜负。撇开相机不说。Canon的JPEG格式图片是非常棒的。处理的非常非常好！
RAW:
Easy winner. If you shoot RAW, Nikon is it. Also there is an issue with the Canon with the color red. I think the color is overblown at times because all the details are loss and not recoverable in Lightroom. Not always but it has happened at least twice. The same photo on the Nikon kept all the details.

Raw格式
显而易见的胜负。如果你用Raw格式来照相，你首先要考虑到佳能特有的红色（尼康黄呢？），我觉得5D3颜色上有的时候有色散，因为细节不能全包括进去。不是经常发生，但是已经发生了至少两次。一样的照片，尼康就可以看到所有的细节

Autofocus:
About the same. Canon and Nikon have awesomely quick autofocus and I couldn't determine a difference. The only caveat is that Nikon focuses better in lowlight (without the autofocus assist lamp) and also the Nikon focuses when there is almost no light (with the autofocus assist lamp). Why the heck doesn't Canon include an autofocus assist lamp is beyond me. Also, Nikon's face detection is extremely useful because it focuses right on the eyeballs.
自动对焦
基本上一样。佳能和尼康都有着过人的自动对焦系统。我不能确定他们的不同。唯一的一点是尼康自动对焦系统在低光下可以更好地工作，甚至在基本没有光的条件下。（有自动对焦辅助灯）不知道为什么佳能没有。并且尼康人脸识别系统非常有用，因为总能对焦到眼球。

Flash:
Easy winner. Canon doesn't have built in flash. Nikon flash worked surprisingly well.

闪光灯
显而易见。佳能没有装闪光在机身，而尼康的闪光却工作的异常的好

Dynamic Range:
Easy winner. Nikon knocked it out of the park. I got a lot less blown highlights with shots with white clothing and more realistic blue skys. Also, there is a lot more headroom on both the highlights and shadows on the Nikon when editing in Lightroom. How did Nikon have better shadows and highlights! They have to share some of that technology!
动态范围
显而易见，尼康。。。（Knocked it out of the park 不知道怎么翻译，应该是说在公园里拍照比较好，谁帮忙说一些谢谢）当我拍照时只有很少的一点光，但是我却可以拍出白色的云，逼真的蓝天。并且在高光和阴影下，Nikon的纯净度也更高，到底Nikon是怎么做到的呢？他们真的该分享一下这方面的技术。

Video:
Suprisingly about the same. I would have thought that Canon's lead in video would maintain. Surprisingly, the Nikon's video was just as awesome as the Canon. Nikon's video has a bit more detail and is definitely a little sharper than the Canon. I didn't test Nikon's uncompressed HDMI out, although it seems to be a useful feature (this is like RAW HDMI output for video). Canon should adopt uncompressed HDMI out also.

视频
基本一样。我开始考虑佳能还能不能继续占领拍摄视频的领头羊地位。令人惊讶的是，nikon的视频看起来和佳能的一样好。并且尼康的在细节方面更多并且还更锐一点。我没有测试尼康的未压缩格式的 HDMI，这看起来也是很好的功能。（就像Raw格式的视频），佳能也应该提供这项功能！

Price:
Easy winner. Why anyone (who doesn't already have Nikon or Canon lenses) would buy this Canon for $500 more than the Nikon would need to think twice. I can see why the Nikon is selling so much better than the Canon, at least on Amazon.

价格
显而易见。我要好好想想为什么有人会多花500块钱在佳能身上（没有镜头负担的条件下）。我想我明白了为什么Nikon卖的比佳能好很多了，至少在亚马逊上面。

Comfort:
Both about the same weight. Both feel nice in the hand. Canon possibly slightly more comfortable if you have bigger hands. Nikon maybe more comfortable with smaller hands. Both are fine though.

舒适度
两台机器基本是相同的重量。手感也都相当不错。如果你手大，佳能应该手感更好点。手小的话，尼康可能好一点。反正手感都不错。

USB transfer:
Nikon wins with USB 3.0. Skipping the card reader altogether by just plugging in the camera to the computer is convenient. Also the transfer speed is much much faster than Canon's older USB 2.0. This saves a lot of time.

USB连接
Nikon用的是USB 3.0 就算你不用读卡器也非常方便。并且传输速度快于佳能的老式的USB2.0很多很多。可以省掉很多时间。

LCD Screen:
Canon has slightly better screen in direct sunlight (LCD facing up towards the sun). Nikon is better when the LCD is not directly facing the sun. Nikon's screen is crisper and more 3D like.

LCD屏幕
在阳光下佳能的屏幕要略微好一点。尼康的屏幕在没有阳光直射的情况下要稍微好一点。尼康的屏幕更（crisper鲜艳？）并且更像3D，

Weatherproofing:
My last day of shooting was in a light mist/drizzle. I was shooting both cameras again for about 20 minutes when the Canon 5D mkIII developed some fogging inside the viewfinder screen. I could not wipe it away as it seemed to be inside the camera. I could no longer take pictures normally without live view. Nikon didn't have this problem and I continued to shoot the rest of the day with the Nikon in the same wet conditions without issue. I had planned to shoot at least 2 weeks with both cameras so this was definitely a bummer.

耐用性
我最后一点拍摄在细微的毛毛雨下进行。我用两台相机拍摄差不多20分钟，有些雾状的东西在5D3的取景屏幕（不是取景器）里面，并且我擦不掉。好像进到机身里面一样。我不能像往常一样用所见即所得模式拍照。Nikon没有这个问题，所以所以我剩下的时间都在用D800拍摄，还是干的并且没有任何毛病。我已经测试了至少两周所以，这一点也是显而易见的Bummer。(又一个词没翻译出来）
Lenses:
Both Canon and Nikon's 24-70 2.8 lenses are great. I would say the Canon 24-70 2.8 is just a tad faster on focus. Nikon is slightly sharper in the corners. Both Nikon and Canon seem to have a very comparable lens assortment (although my wallet won't be happy buying so many new lenses!)

镜头
佳能和尼康的24-70 F2.8都很不错。我会说佳能的24-70对焦稍微快一点点。尼康的在边角更锐一点。尼康和佳能也都有很不错的镜头库（当然我的钱包将不会开心）

Well, after using both cameras for about a week, I kept the Nikon D800 and returned my (possibly water damaged) Canon 5D mkIII. Both are phenomenal cameras but D800 has definitely outclassed the 5D mkIII in this round. Maybe Canon will come back strong with its next version. It definitely has some catching up to do.

Thanks for reading my review and I'll also post this on the Nikon D800 and Canon 5D mkIII review page. Best of luck to all you photogs and enjoy these phenomenal cameras!

好了！在结束使用这几天的使用之后，我留下了D800，退掉了我（可能进水的）5d3. 这两台都是很好的相机，但是D800在某些方面远胜于5D3，也许佳能会在下一代机身上下点猛料，我想他必须想法赶上。

谢谢读我的评价，这篇评价5d3和D800两边我都发了。深深的祝福你能拍到好的照片然后享受你手里的相机。

其实我个人认为这一轮Nikon赢了，不是一点。

并且我觉得镜头负担和对品牌的忠诚度也真的影响到销售。
问题是这两家做的都不错，我认识2个人第一时间就预订了5D3，他们都是5D2的用户，并且也都觉得用的不错，所以直接就升5D3了。有一个是风景摄影师，我看过他的一些作品，确实很棒，用的就是17-40. 他会感叹D800的参数，不过也就这样而已了。而我认识尼康的用户，都没有第一时间升级D800。

因为不太关心。已经认准D800了 小弟我原来也是用佳能的，用了段时间1100D，觉得不错入了5D2，成像也不错了，不过外形太难看，质感也差就出了。现在用尼康，也没心情看5D3，不过应该也是很不错的机器了。毕竟都到这个价位了。

这句话没翻对。应该是：我本来打算两台相机都至少测试两个星期的，所以这毫无疑问是一件不愉快的事（指5DIII进水，只试用了1星期）。

美国的CN粉也和WJ差不多阿。

同样一片评论，在D800的产品下106 of 111认为评论有用。5D3的产品下，15 of 56认为有用。

LZ怎么没把5D3的评论翻译一下？对5D3的评论好像更多些。

美国亚马逊上：
12人对D800进行了评论，10人评5星
22人对5D3进行了评论，16人评5星

对5D3最大的不满是价格，3500美元；D800为3000美元。相信会有不少新人因为500美元的差价而买 D800的。

国人被奴役惯了，不知道自己本应享受的很多权利
本帖由移动终端发布

Ken Rockwell 的ISO对比出来了：

D800 和5D3 的高感差不多，D800 稍多细节。

钱二者优于D4。

X-Pro1 和 D4 差不多。

你不乐意，就不买。说不上亏还是不亏。你说是不是？

供需关系严重影响价格，这是经济的基本规律吧？

没人买，价格自然就下来了；如果价格下来还没人买，那就停产；绝大部分产品没人买，就破产倒闭。你说是不是？

这年头，买什么车还真不好说。 QQ和Smart，我选Smart，哪怕在南京路上开10公里/小时，还经常停下来等红灯。忘了说，外加奔驰的昂贵售后！

怎么总有些人觉得消费者都是傻帽儿？

买单的的人亏了？官方指导价和实际售价，买单的不知道？

不知道那些在南京路上开法拉利的是不是亏大发了。

哎！

以前d80用的是d200的ccd，因为后出，iso上还优于d200
d700和d3的关系也是以下犯上

这个年代的实惠的是用户，以下犯上是好事。

今天d800卖2w8，价格以下犯上，买单的人亏大发了。over

d800很不错，终于摆脱了12mp糟糕年代。2年前我因为实在没法接受d700像素，入了5d2。追的就是像素。
我认为器材派其实不该有什么门户之见，既然后面那个头不如前面那个头，不多玩几家好货也是可惜的。

现在的问题是，d700用户如果攒的是大三元，金圈头，那可以平滑过渡到d800。否则无异于换门。

另外d800价格可以买到d3s，nikon这是怎么了？经常干以下犯上的事儿，以前是占便宜，这次亏大发了

5n的6400我没法接受，哪怕机内强制处理我也没法接受。
上一张100%下的iso3200，exif都在，别吵了，d800基本就这个水准