我说的也是事实，的确神器诞生了，8000卖的太便宜。

算了你还是先去百度一下硬盘录像机比较好 本帖最后由 游走zzz 于 2013-10-18 00:18 编辑

那好说，神器诞生了。8000卖的太便宜？

而且：EOSHD（没错“感动常在”的地盘）已经第一时间试用了 RX10工程机的视频（大致试用下来是：第一次真正在相机中实现了：全像素采样的视频，视频画质是让人鼓舞的，虽然没有完全消除摩尔纹，但相比其它相机轻微得太多了，而且解像度是超高的，完全不像普通相机输出 1080p视频那样“糊”。具体英文的描述看得懂的话，自己去看吧）：

http://www_eoshd_com/content/11337/surprise-new-sony-rx10-sensor-full-pixel-readout-5k-raw-video-output

Here’s what Dave Etchels at Imaging Resource had to say about video on the RX10 -

Where the Sony RX10 really breaks new ground for video, though, is that it’s the first camera we’re aware of that reads out the entire sensor pixel array for every frame, performing sub-sampling/video anti-aliasing in the processor. This potentially addresses the huge bugaboo of still-camera video recording, namely the tendency towards moiré and false-color artifacts, thanks to the mismatch between still-image and video resolution.

Pretty much every digital still camera we’ve tested produces very noticeable moiré patterns and color artifacts in its video. (The Canon 5D Mark III deserves note as doing better than most, but even it still shows some level of video artifacts.)

The issue is that a still camera has to get rid of a lot of its image data in order to output a 1,920 x 1,080 video image. They usually don’t have enough processor horsepower to do a proper job of sub-sampling the image in the vertical direction (across scan lines), so resort to simply skipping rows of pixels, jumping 2, 3, or 4 rows for each one actually output. The problem with this is that the image data is way undersampled from an image-processing standpoint, so moiré and artifacts are pretty much guaranteed. It’s not that the industry doesn’t know what to do to prevent the problem, it’s just that there isn’t enough processing horsepower available to do what the job requires. Until now.

Besides its advantages for still image processing, the new BIONZ X processor in the Sony RX10 has a special LSI front-end processing section ideally suited to processing huge amounts of video data on the fly. For the first time (that we’re aware of), the RX10′s processor clocks the entire 20-megapixel image off the array up to 60 times/second, and then sub-samples (think of it as a special class of signal averaging) the raw image data digitally, to produce the final 1,920 x 1,080 video image. Doing so effectively performs a low-pass filtering operation on the video data, thus greatly reducing the propensity for moiré and false color artifacts.

While our sample camera was only a prototype, we did take it outside and challenge it with some subjects that typically produce bad moiré or false-color patterns with cameras we test. The results were very encouraging. It didn’t completely eliminate moiré patterns, but they were greatly reduced relative to just about every other camera we’ve seen, and there were no false-color artifacts to be seen anywhere. Not only that, but the video itself was very clean and crisp-looking, so the reduction in false color and moiré didn’t seem to come at the expense of mushy subject detail. 本帖最后由 西区苛刻 于 2013-10-17 16:05 编辑

自己看吧，这是索尼日本官网，昨天A7系列太火发布会都美人关注这个
http://www_sony_jp/cyber-shot/products/DSC-RX10/feature_3.html

9倍超采样？目前不相信，基本不可能。顶级产品也不过4倍而已

差别非常大,RX10是全像素超采样1080P

我觉得这个机子的步伐夸得太猛了点，1寸底，等效24-200/2.8 ，价格不说，体积重量吃不消啊。

其实焦距等效24-105就很好了，外形到无所谓，R1外形都能接受。

这个200mm端，对焦距离30CM，放大倍率0.38，这个微距能力够可以的......

1寸底的面积是全副的1/9左右，要想达到相同通光量，f2.8等效全副的光圈要小于5.6，大概6.3级别吧。
本帖由 Huawei 客户端发布

无图无JB

不过有无损HDMI输出，到底什么场合下，比较好用呢？

表面上看好像没啥差别，索尼相机产品线的通用标准。

不过有无损HDMI输出

rx10对于那些预算充足的人 会买的
后期过个1年半载   降价后 需求量会更大。

rx100初期价格4多  现在价格3000多   需求量一直不减啊 本帖最后由 ygqiang 于 2013-10-17 13:10 编辑

你找个尼康的恒定光圈变焦头，比如那个老的金广角17-35/F2.8玩玩，就懂了。

再给你举个例子。你找个富士X-E1套机看看，套头上有光圈环，但光圈环上没有光圈刻度。为啥？因为那个变焦套头不是恒定光圈的，你一变焦，光圈就变了，因此无法标定光圈数值。这下懂了没？ 本帖最后由 天漠虎峪 于 2013-10-17 13:17 编辑