四角全麦的boxster操控性最好

可惜价格是不靠谱的39.88w-42.88w，这个价位，这车确实不值得惦记了

本地鳌拜见面率也比森林人高

+10~15w

这2.4的换过来。和韩拉大一样上不了坡

秋香喜欢，没办法呀。

学习。

偷油的接手后，扫把佬打了鸡血了，一路高歌猛进，不服不行。

后视野很差。
后悬架占据太大空间，尾箱变窄。刹车也不够力。
Car and Driver的编辑评价很低。
And Now for the Bad News

But all of that—the stuff shared with the conventional Accord—is actually the good news. We get to the bad stuff when evaluating the Crosstour’s unique aspects, largely the cargo area. Go by the spec-sheet volume numbers, and all seems well. With the rear seats folded, the Crosstour can handle 51 cubic feet of cargo volume, a huge jump over the 14 cubic feet of trunk space in the Accord sedan. Of course, the sedan’s rear seats fold to swallow more stuff, but the open hatch of the Crosstour is more practical for larger items.

In practice, though, the cargo area is compromised by vertical plastic monoliths that hide the rear shock towers. They severely bite into the available width, meaning you can only take advantage of the Crosstour’s full 51.3 cubic feet of cargo volume if you’re hauling, say, a ginormous, shape-conforming bag of water. You could also carry many, many smaller items—400 canned hams, for example—arranged to fill the entire space.

It doesn’t get better. Visibility is just tolerable to the direct rear, with the sloping backlight providing a slim viewing area. Honda’s designers fitted a second, lower tinted-glass window, à la Toyota Prius (or Honda’s own Insight and CR-Z), which helps a bit, but that means there’s a big crossbar where the two pieces of glass meet. A rearview camera helps when backing up, but it comes only with the woeful navigation system. The Crosstour’s blind spots are gargantuan, too, the result of seriously chubby D-pillars. It’s not that you can’t see what’s in the blind spots; it’s that you have to be outside the car to do so.

Finally, the brakes have been swiped from the smaller, lighter CR-V, and the Crosstour’s extra weight makes them work extra hard for results that are merely adequate. Our tested stopping distance (70-to-0 mph took 188 feet) was comparable to the Toyota Venza’s, but the Crosstour’s brakes were prone to fade. We’re not talking about a problem that calls for congressional hearings, but stopping is not a confidence-inspiring affair.

All of this adds up to a compromised vehicle. Our tester came in at $3695 more than a comparable Accord sedan but doesn’t drive nearly as well, and the extra utility promised by the hatchback is actually pretty limited. Mick may have said, “You can’t always get what you want,” but he followed that optimistically with, “If you try sometimes/You might find/You get what you need.” And he was right. For shoppers in this category, it’s called the Pilot or CR-V.

http://www_caranddriver_com/reviews/car/10q3/2010_honda_accord_crosstour_fwd-short_take_road_test

有好事者比较傲虎和这个歌诗图：
An Outback can be had for less money (even 6-cylinder models), has a more useful and user-friendly cargo area, much better rear visibility, and a superior AWD system.
http://townhall-talk_edmunds_com/direct/view/.f21790a/0
更便宜，空间更大，后视野好太多，更好的AWD系统。

围观结束，同志们可以散了。

原来这么贵，大家都散了吧，全都不用惦记了

39.88w-42.88w人家广汽直接就把这6w给您加上了,不用您惦记

现在被排量税一吓，估计大家都怕怕了

感脚这是近期（或今年）最丑陋的车。

当X6那类型的买

就老实惠了

丰田那个似乎更接近subaru Exiga ，是mpv。跟这个不太同。