58

夕阳下的虹口公园

漂亮极了。不过主要是前期和后期之功，和58关系不大哈，弄个18-105加您的力量也是这效果。

再58

看了你的片子，也就那样，别把自己整得很高大上，尼康这玩意就这价，觉得不值完全可以不买，要是有个一样素质的牌子叫TUTU2009，只卖100RMB，我想我肯定会买这个叫TUTU2009的镜头，才不会买尼康。
以下内容由 jacht 于 2014-10-1 11:23 补充
补充一下，有尼康58/1.4G我肯定不会再去买S50.
S35可以考虑，毕竟不是一个焦段，当然如果TUTU2009牌35有尼康35G的素质且只卖200RMB，我肯定会买。让尼康和适马死一边去吧。

你悟了个头啊？买了个58G就开悟了？真傻！“言语道断,心行处灭”懂不懂啊亲？开悟的境界是言语能讨论的不？能讨论的话，佛祖为啥拈花一笑呢？

我从来没有说这个头没有特色，事实上它非常有特色，但要用得好，用得其所，懂不懂啊亲？而我所反对的，就是这个头现在的价格水份太多了，明白了否？

瞧瞧吧，是不是贵了？定力不够的同学们，或者猴急猴急地想作小白鼠的同学们，我再转个Ken Rockwell的评论给你们看看：

Recommendations （建议）

If you live in a laboratory, then this 58/1.4G is slightly sharper than other 50mm lenses, but it can't focus as close as the others. If you need the greatest sharpness, the 55mm f/2.8 AF or 60mm f/2.8 G are even better ideas for much less money.

There isn't any visible performance difference in actual photography, but not being able to focus as close as other lenses significantly limits the pictures you can take with this 58mm lens. The sample I purchased of this 58mm lens didn't focus as accurately as my 50/1.4G, so my 50/1.4G actually gives better real-world results. I presumed that AF Fine Tuning would fix what I saw, but after seeing at spherochromatism how the point of optimum definition doesn't correlate to the point of least color fringing, I suspect that AF Fine Tuning might not fix what I thought was a slight focus error. No worries, these effects are only visible at large apertures, and once you stop down, all 50mm lenses are the same.

This 58mm lens is essentially the 50/1.4G put in a big plastic barrel with the price jacked up to pretend it's a Canon 50/1.2L. I wouldn't buy one of these; I prefer the smaller 50/1.4G that focuses closer and sells for a fraction of the price, with the same sharpness and bokeh performance for all practical intents and purposes. This 58mm lens isn't exotic; it's just priced like it.

Therefore, I see that this 58/1.4G will become wildly popular with weekend shooters who make too much money at other jobs during the week. For serious shooting, I prefer the 50/1.4G; I see no benefit to this lens other than improving Nikon's profits for shareholders. Profits are good, without them Nikon would be forced to exit the imaging market entirely, and without which we wouldn't see the really good low-production stuff, like S3 Year 2000 commemorative cameras, that solid profits allow large companies to go build.

比较多，我只简单地译下关键的第三段啊：

58G本质上是50/1.4G 加了个大号价格塑料筒，然后在冒充佳能50/1.2L罢了。我不会买其中的任何一支，我推荐小一点的50/1.4G ——它能更近距离地对焦，而且价格更亲民些，同时，对于所有目标的拍摄来说，其锐度与焦外表现与之没有区别。这支58G并不神奇，只是它的标价使它看上去比较神奇罢了。

http://www_kenrockwell_com/nikon/58mm-f14-g.htm


最后，祝各位大师玩得开心，多出大片！

58

58

85拍全身也不咋地，全身还是得135,220··

用值不值评价一个头是没意义的     蔡司的55值不值？  比S50贵那么多  又能好多少？

从成本的考虑   镜头的成本都不高    其实所有的头都不值   

58存在缺点   但也有它无法被别的头取代的优势   说白了  这是颗特色头     

喜欢它这特色的人  它就是卖2W也有人买   不喜欢的   它卖3000 又如何？   

58敢卖这么贵   自然就有他的自信

比如下面这张（引用）    至少你所推崇的S35  85G   我就没看到具备如此雾化般的虚化过渡    对于喜欢这一特色的人来说  58 就有它的价值。。
   

亲，不要激动嘛！

你器材再好，或者技术再佳，拍出来的东西都摆这里了，是不是？

我等过来瞧一瞧，看一看，评头论足一番，也实属再正常不过的事了，难道说，没吃过猪肉的人，连看猪跑的权利都没有了吗？

刀锋大师，看看你置顶的那4张照片，没有一张是全身相，是不是？

你们置顶的只有一张全身相，反倒拍成环境人像了，这是拍美女不？

对了，你有空把你那张照片的原始图发在这里，或发在那个贴里给我们开开眼行不？就是你抠掉背景那张，穿旗袍靠柱子那美女。

真没啥可刺激的，只是觉得你挺好玩的、、嘿嘿嘿

刀锋大师明显是受了点刺激了。。。。

既然这是58/1.4G的俱乐部，请你要么发一些你认为用S35拍得好的照片上来，或者58/1.4G拍的美图，不需要那么多口水喷这喷那。镜头是用来拍照片的，不是吹水的！ 本帖最后由 walkmannn 于 2014-9-29 19:34 编辑