千万别用绿盘，又慢又烂，前两年买过一批，陆续出问题换掉了
本帖由 iPhone 4S 客户端发布

RAID1肯定最保险，但我没查到证据表明家用NAS上使用监控盘比NAS盘更不安全。
至少QNAP推荐的硬盘里就包括监控盘（实际上桌面、监控、NAS、企业都有推荐）

俺不做这么不负责任的推荐。如果非要冒险，请选择双盘位RAID1。

造RAID卡的不只你列的这几个厂家，这几个还都是低档家用品牌。如果不是为了这个原因，WD岂不是在自找苦吃？

http://wdc_custhelp_com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1397/~/difference-between-desktop-edition-(wd-blue,-wd-green-and-wd-black)-and-raid

Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition (RE) hard drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically as a stand-alone drive, or in a multi-drive RAID environment.
If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly. This is caused by the normal error recovery procedure that a desktop edition hard drive uses.
NOTE
Note: There are a few cases where the manufacturer of the RAID controller have designed their cards to work with specific model Desktop drives. If this is the case you would need to contact the manufacturer of that controller for any support on that drive while it is used in a RAID environment. Desktop Class Hard Drives are tested and recommended for use in consumer-type RAID applications (RAID-0 / RAID-1). For more information about using a Desktop hard drive in a RAID please see Answer ID 996: Support for WD desktop drives in a RAID 0 or RAID 1 configuration.

When an error is found on a desktop edition hard drive, the drive will enter into a deep recovery cycle to attempt to repair the error, recover the data from the problematic area, and then reallocate a dedicated area to replace the problematic area. This process can take up to 2 minutes depending on the severity of the issue. Most RAID controllers allow a very short amount of time for a hard drive to recover from an error. If a hard drive takes too long to complete this process, the drive will be dropped from the RAID array. Most RAID controllers allow from 7 to 15 seconds for error recovery before dropping a hard drive from an array. Western Digital does not recommend installing desktop edition hard drives in an enterprise environment (on a RAID controller).
Western Digital RAID edition hard drives have a feature called TLER (Time Limited Error Recovery) which stops the hard drive from entering into a deep recovery cycle. The hard drive will only spend 7 seconds to attempt to recover. This means that the hard drive will not be dropped from a RAID array. While TLER is designed for RAID environments, a drive with TLER enabled will work with no performance decrease when used in non-RAID environments.
本帖最后由 PowerPCG8 于 2015-2-20 23:45 编辑

绿盘名声臭了之后推出的，专用于磁盘阵列。

SATA盘会在监测出内部问题后启动所谓的错误恢复过程，绿盘进入此状态后会超过8秒不向主机报告状态，RAID控制器(阵列卡)会自动卸载掉超过8秒没有任何响应的硬盘并报告错误，然后开始进入阵列的错误校正过程，有可能导致阵列系统停掉以及冗长的RAID卷恢复动作。

　　当打开有TLER的硬盘在检测到本次错误校正无法在7秒钟之内完成的话，会在每个第7秒的时刻向RAID控制器(阵列卡)发出信息宣示它的存在，RAID控制器就能够在8秒的阈值检测到这个物理驱动器仍然在线，从而不会将其卸载掉，RAID卷也就不会损坏，系统停掉以及冗长的RAID卷恢复动作也就不会发生。 本帖最后由 PowerPCG8 于 2015-2-20 22:31 编辑

从来只用绿盘。没事就休眠，下载用2.5寸盘，系统用ssd。绿盘就存储，平时休眠，用时唤醒。
本帖由安卓客户端编辑于：2015-02-20 22:17:09

盘片数太多，可靠性堪虞

那更烂。非要用WD盘装阵列，最好不要6T盘，用也是用红盘。

我都不知道你是谁，你倒是很在意我的那些帖子嘛，真是晦气到家了。

你放心，Aperture俺还会继续用个两三年。

红盘下载，绿盘存储，黑盘重要数据存储。

看清楚，我说要PT就上红盘，一盘数据存储绿盘raid5足够。
本帖由安卓客户端发布

idle3设成-1

西数即将推出针对存储东瀛爱情动作片的黄盘,必须黄盘玩起来才够匹配

仔细想想小姚推荐的就没什么合适过

Aperture眼看好几年没更新了，他还到处推荐。这不，终于被苹果抛弃了

坛子里一有人问路由器，只要他看见，肯定跑进去推荐苹果Airport Extreme。性能差，功能少，贵

大概几年前用过一个WD，用错了地方挂了，一有人问硬盘，他肯定进去，“不推荐WD”

绿盘真心不能做下载用，我8个绿盘，4个报警，换希捷的，近一年还行。
本帖由 Windows Phone_1.0.7.0 客户端发布