少了颗粒是不是不像胶片了。

Adox cms 20胶片（D76显影液）。

FM2n+蔡司50/1.4

更喜欢有人的风景

丫头好酷啊

...... 本帖最后由 不拍 于 2021-8-8 03:12 编辑

喜欢这张，无人的风景也很有味道

......

不论旁轴或者单反。光比超越底片宽容。就十分的不好兼顾冲洗。理论上是一卷一个光比才好兼顾。讲究的就是120换后背的机器。一个光比一个后背。冲洗上有所侧重。有人爱多曝光。缺舍不得用高宽底片。呜呼 本帖最后由 shenshenshen 于 2021-8-5 06:19 编辑
以下内容由 shenshenshen 于 2021-8-5 06:23 补充
其实顺光最省事，最能兼顾各级灰度表现。复杂光线就麻烦。黑影里面的细节就没有

没错，这个更正点，黑白分明！

这个稍微的正点一些

......

调子太正点了

----------------------    本帖使用的镜头们   --------------------------------------

福伦达voigtlander skoparex 35mm F3.4 5/6 (Distagon like)
福伦达voigtlander skopar 50/2.8   3/4
施耐德Schneidar xenon 50/1.9 4/6
施耐德Tele-Xenar 135mm F4.0   4/4

Leica Summicron Rigid  50/2.0
Leica Summaron 35/3.5  4/6
Leica Summicrom 35/2.0  4/6

Rolleiflex T Tessar 75/3.5   3/4
Rolleicord xenar 75/3.5     3/4
Zeiss Ikonta M Tessar75/3.5     3/4

Rollei 35 Tessar 40/3.5     3/4

Rollei QBM 50/1.8 planar     4/6
Rollei QBM zeiss 85/2.8 sonnar    4/4
Pentacon 50/2.4  

------------------   Fomapan 400 对比 Kodak Tri-x   ------------------------------

Curve: Higher toe
For red: appear lighter
For cyan: appear darker
Iso: approximate 250
Grain: much larger
Sharpness: about the same

------------------    Rodinal vs HC110            -------------------------------

Rodinal gives, for the most part a fairly long and straight curve, which means very even tonality. Shadow detail is slightly compressed so you will see a distinct toe. If you develop longer in Rodinal, pretty much the whole curve adds density at the same rate, and it's very powerful so it'll keep doing that for a long time. But straight line, unless you slow down agitation a bit (to 3 minute or 5 minute agitation intervals), in which case you can force a curve with a shoulder and somewhat compressed highlights.

HC-110 gives an upswept curve as well as a toe. To me, effective film speed (shadow detail) is very similar between HC-110 and Rodinal.
The upswept curve means very good separation the higher up towards the highlights you get. But be careful, if you develop for too long you will easily go beyond the printable range and get highlights that block up. In normal negatives this also means that if you bring down highlights to printable levels, by using a lower contrast paper or paper filter, mid-tones can seem a bit dark. This is good for some subject matter, and not so much for other kinds.

Both developers can give very pleasing results, and lots of people do just that all the time. They are different in tonality, however, as described above, where Rodinal catches more of the highlights, but with less separation than HC-110, but has better separation in the mid-tones, and shadow detail is about equal. In my opinion, Rodinal is better for medium to high contrast lighting, and HC-110 better for low contrast lighting.

Less important, to me, is that Rodinal gives a sharp, but beautiful grain, whereas HC-110 looks a bit less distinct. Rodinal gives sharper edges. HC-110 gives slightly finer grain.

......

呢现在拍胶片用135AF头？