说得很正确，看看市场就知道了，腾龙，几乎没有水货，适马，卖的全部是水货，想买行货还不好买。日硕这么傻？拱手让出市场？不傻，很聪明，借着代理的名义，从其他地区串货，搞到中国来当水货卖，省了代理费，还省了售后！！！！国内水货的源头就是垃圾日硕！！！！！

北京的也可以

跟服务人员个人没关系，是适马公司烂。

不买适马同时告诫身边的人不买就行了。服务人员也没办法。

死马的在国外名声也不咋的。
原文已经被删了，不过在其它网站还能找到：
http://www_sandiegodslr_com/?q=node/578

For all those, and there are plenty, who use 3rd party lenses, especially sigma, here is an interesting development at Lens Rental (http://www_lensrentals_com/news/2008.09.12/the-sigma-saga):

"For about a year now, we’ve had internal discussions at Lensrentals about carrying Sigma lenses. On the one hand, Sigma makes some excellent and unique lenses that are at a very attractive price. Some of them, like the 120-300 f2.8, 50-150 f2.8, and the 150-500 zooms are unique: there are no other lenses of similar aperture and focal length. And we know a lot of our customers are interested in trying these lenses to decide if they’re reasonable alternatives to the ‘brand names’ so we were one of the first rental houses to stock Sigma, and still stock more varieties and copies than anyone else.

Since day 1 the Sigma brand has always been a bit of a money loser for us: they broke more frequently than the other brands. Our techs coined the phrase “Sigma’d” to describe any lens that didn’t function. When they did break, the repair turnaround time was, to be charitable, leisurely. We knew to buy a replacement, it would usually be several weeks and often a couple of months before we got the original copy returned repaired. But we knew a lot of you wanted to try these lenses and its our job to have what you want, so we stocked them.

In the last year, however, things have gotten much, much worse. One third of the Sigma 150-500 and 120-400 lenses we bought were defective out of the box and had to be exchanged. Several more broke during their first and second rentals. New copies of other Sigma lenses showed up with high defective rates out of the box. Repairs have become even slower and now even our routine in-warranty repairs are being refused and billed as ‘customer damage’, even though we’ve never rented them out, simply tested them.

Several weeks ago we placed warnings on a number of lenses that they were ‘high risk’ of failure. All but two of these were Sigma, despite the fact that Sigma is less than 7% of our lens inventory. When we looked at our actual numbers things were even more bleak: Sigma lenses failed at a rate of 30% per year, compared to less than 5% for Canon, Tamron, Nikon, Tokina, and Zeiss. We weren’t losing a little bit of money anymore, we were losing a fair amount. More importantly, far more importantly, we had customers who rented lenses for important shoots and the lenses failed to work properly. Sigma was about 5% of our rentals but almost one-third of our customer complaints.

We aren’t going to stop renting Sigma entirely but we are going to close out two lines (the 150-500 and 120-400) that have developed so many problems as to be unusable. We will not stock Sigma when there are better alternatives (70-200 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8 for example). We will continue to carry those Sigma lenses that are unique and where there aren’t more reliable options (120-300 f2.8 for example), at least for now, but we are not going to offer our “2 in 2” guarantee on Sigma products any longer. The reason is simple: we’re happy to buy a new copy for you to rent, but in the case of Sigma we may have to buy 2 or 3 new copies to get one that passes inspection. There isn’t time to do that in two weeks.

We’ll monitor the situation and hope that someday soon Sigma gets their quality control back to “below average” from its current “worse than imaginable” and we can stock them like the other lenses in our lineup.

Thank you,

Roger Cicala"

兔子悬了...

没错，楼主还算好的，就电话联系，你要上门去，能吓你一跟头，感觉像是个随时要卷铺盖走人的兼容机装机店的规模。

刚看到这个帖子,我的24/1.8跑焦送去调试,把我的无敌兔也留下了,担心呀.

直接寄给Sigma HK，速度更快，RS，大奸商一个

日硕，呵呵，打过交道。

那时是看上超广，在适马1020和图丽1224之间选择。打了电话去日硕，接电话的是个男士，没说几句对方就开始表露的很不耐烦，并几次打断我的问话，给我的感觉这位男士不光不了解产品，更是不懂礼貌。

和楼上几位观点一样，适马找日硕这种公司做产品代理，行货水货就没啥区别，态度决定一切，对于潜在客户都没啥好态度，还能指望他们能做好售后服务？

日硕-是我所遇到的最烂的公司.

https://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=594670

日硕就是个垃圾公司
所以我全买水货~反正行货也跟没保修一样，不如比rp

类似不重视中国市场的还有玛米亚...

上海日硕只是销售商，适马中国是指香港的公司，适马对中国大陆的市场不重视，这也是他现在还是一个二线厂商的主要原因

死马现在根本就不重视中国的市场，所以产生了日硕这么个东西，死马的东西在洋鬼子这里卖得不错，到了国内问题就这么多，死马也没个反应，应该让喜欢死马产品的同志们联合起来，给死马总公司发发邮件，让他们重视起来。