蔡司要出ZF 15/2.8和25/2了，JLC爷有没有兴趣？

是这样啊，前段玩个zeiss战前无膜白头，因为里面状态特别好，不仅不会见光死，没遮光罩大太阳下毫无畏惧。

昨晚俺忽然想 那个全世界缺货导致建议零售价$4995,而二手价格却要6~7K的leica summilux 35mm(Floating Element) , 俺很田鸡赛马的想,是不是如果不怕镜头体积大,其实zeiss cp.2 35mm $3900的价格更实惠些,image quality更好些? 熊台见谁横向比过哇?

ZF35/2穿了身铠甲 哈哈哈~~~~ 不过颜色比ZF35好很多，边角比中心稍差些。

这里有人测过。

http://www_slrlensreview_com/web/carl-zeiss-slr-lenses-51/wide-angle-slr-lenses-93/790-carl-zeiss-cp2-distagon-t-35mm-t21-ze-.html

我突然觉得,喜欢佳能85L 50L 24L的人可以搞搞这三支的佳能C电影头,还能长时间使用,还能转接,不用担心马达坏掉等等.

隔壁回过了,这是一个普通的摄影头改造的,80-200头,大约是nikon.

哈哈 这是山寨，，，，

http://www_fdtimes_com/pdfs/45FDTimes-LoRez150.pdf
zeiss有意生产新的CP.2了明年.
Anamorphics, Zooms and Primes. Carl Zeiss has an ambitious new roadmap.
Zooms Join Compact Cine Lens Line
We're Back in the Anamorphic Lens Business

http://www_filmaker_cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=15968&extra=page%3D1%26filter%3Dtypeid%26typeid%3D15&page=2
北京新影厂旁边有个挺有名的器材租赁公司，去年花二十几万买了一组共七只CP.2镜头，租了几次客户反映意见不小，最后老板趁更多人对此镜头还不太了解之机，索性以十八万元价格将这七只CP.2镜头一次性处理了。永远记住在这个世界上是没有任何一个人愿意做亏本生意的，尤其是以此养家糊口的器材租赁商。
其实这个原因非常简单，使用CP.2的人心里需求是电影镜头的技术特性，但此镜头的技术特征是照相机镜头的。
其实照相机镜头干照相机的事是最合适不过。
就像让一台拖拉机干拖拉机的事是最合适不过的，你给他换上跑车轮胎和跑车外形其本质还是拖拉机。甭管你卖到了与以前几倍的价钱，如果按跑车的心里要求其实会很受伤。
CP.2本质核心其实完全是一次技术投机加市场投机的产物。
不过敢于尝试其实也未见得是一件坏事。

刚看了http://www_reduser_net/forum/showthread.php?71717-FINALLY!!!-Got-my-Canon-mounts-and-just-tested-the-hell-out-of-it!那个帖子,其中一段说佳能50L居然比zeiss MP50/T1.3还sharp。
Ketch, I'll never take what you say the wrong way.
So all is cool.
We are all big boys, been around for years, shot everything from 10x8 t0 super 8... been there done that. Made our millions... So its ok to share with me some of your thoughts and experiences.

Regarding the Master primes, 50mm Canon back to back we did (and only for a bit of fun) ... nobody was more agasp more than me... I was just bragging to every with me at the time that the Master primes will eat the canon for breakfast... we shot the same thing, put it up on a huge projector and a 2.4 screen, ZOOMed up to 100% 200% 400% 800%... quite literally made a fool of myself because there was not a single bit of difference... on the edges included. That was @ f8.
If I cut the slate of the front, you would think it was from the same lens.

The worst was about to come, both lenses were set to f1.2 for the canon, f1.3 for the master prime... Ouch. The Canon was sharper.
Sorry mate.... Proof is in the pudding....

Mind you! Here me out...

I have had many lenses from nikon, Arri, and Canon over the years, (to many) And quite often I have swapped them out. I went through 3 different 600m F4's before I got a sharp one. 2 - 4002.8's 4 - 16 to 35's before I got a sharp one, 2 - 50mm 1.2's before I get a sharp one..... and I have never been able to send back my soft 18mm Ultra prime.. or soft 18 and 24mm Ziess... We had a soft 29 - 290 soft one day.. so not all lenses are built the same.

Regarding Leica glass... Well. Only the crazy rich will ever know the quality of Leica.

Regarding hanging my EPIC off the 600mm... Seriously does not worry it, but would hate to drop it... thats when it gets messy. But I doupt Ill do it again anyway, becuase it was out of balance. I'm going to make a rig to balance it.

At the end of the day, we all have done our personal testing, some more than others. I went into my canon lens testing only for a laugh... As plastic toy lenses have never floated my boat... but surprise surprise... Reminds me of when I got my first RED 5 years ago. We only bought it to replace a DV CANON XL1... hahahahaha... What we got was another shock.

So life goes on...

求助，电视剧《神医喜来乐》使用啥镜头景深外呈黑白色，人面部模糊一篇。

用处都不一样，就像宝马没货车拉得多。

花钱买CP.2，就像花钱买件阿玛尼衬衫，质量和舒适程度不见得就比七匹狼好，就算好也没有价钱差距这么夸张
但有些人就是要买

最近人气不旺了。继续探讨。。。。。

顺着看完了，太吸引人了。

楼主定下买哪个了吗？

拭目以待。