这个分辨率测试数据我就呵呵了！这数据怎么来的？有原始照片吗？看看dpreview实拍的照片对比吧：

我说这是属于镜头边缘成像的问题，我拿出两款镜头的MTF曲线来证明，你说不是镜头的问题，请问，为啥靠近中心部位的裁图富士的比哈苏要清晰一些呢？

你看下视频，可以问UP要下原片，不要一看到这些问题就给别人扣帽子！那个UP主是真金白银买的，要尊重和你用一样机器的用户，看完拿自己机器对比一下，觉得有问题和那人联系下，有结论了再在这里说比较好。

如果你要谈“虚标ISO”的问题，我先问你，你知道数码相机的ISO是怎么来的吗？

再有，不要拿那些小作坊式的测试来说事！因为这些所谓的测试，都不能提供原始的测试照片，无法去验证其给出的结论是否准确。

蓝拓也说有，B站一个买了GFX-50S的UP主也说有。
这个UP主的视频蛮有意思https://www.bilibili.com/video/av24809364/
关于虚标ISO和高感偏色问题，你可以去和他聊聊看看是不是有这些问题。
还有你比较喜欢dpreview的评测，这个链接可以去看看https://www_dpreview_com/reviews/hasselblad-x1d-50c/3
附上另一边的边缘截图，结果也很明显 本帖最后由 nikonovo 于 2018-6-14 12:14 编辑

请问，你在这个部位裁图，想证明什么呢？是不是属于你所说的“喜欢这个就诋毁那个”的做法呢？ 本帖最后由 不可一试 于 2018-6-14 11:42 编辑

怎么有锯齿？这是100%？

烂托比较客观？地球人都笑了

烂托测试的宽容度X1D比D810差，Dpreview测评结论是富士GFX50S的动态范围比D810稍好，显然，烂托的测试结果与Dpreview测评结论是相互矛盾的，到底哪个测试客观啊？

Dynamic Range

Looking at our ISO Invariance test, you can see the camera is adding a very small amount of (read) noise to its files that starts to become visible if you brighten a Raw in post, rather than amplify in-camera by using a higher ISO gain setting. Lift the ISO a few stops and you almost completely overcome this noise floor, such that there's no difference between shooting at low ISO and pushing, vs. natively shooting at higher ISO.

Part of the reason for this low read noise is likely to be the camera's 16-bit analogue-to-digital converters (or perhaps a slower read-out rate). Contrary to popular belief, greater bit depth doesn't help overall 'tonality'; instead it means there are enough available values to accurately describe the deepest shadows, rather than clumping everything into a few values, leading to a type of noise (quantization error).

This greater definition in deep shadows allows the X1D to surpass the Fujifilm GFX 50S in extremely pushed, base ISO shots. Bill Claff's independent analyses confirm the 0.08 EV advantage in base ISO (photographic) dynamic range over the GFX, and the X1D's lower read noise.

Like Fujifilm's GFX 50S, Hasselblad is taking advantage of this sensor behavior by using the same amount of hardware amplification at all ISO settings above 1600. The images only end up the correct brightness because of a metadata tag telling the Raw converter to brighten the image by the correct amount in post (e.g. +3 EV at ISO 12,800). This means that there is an extra 1EV of highlight data (that would be pushed to clipping, if amplification were increased) for each stop that ISO is increased over and above ISO 1600 - relative to a traditional camera.

This means once you reach ISO 1600, unlike tradition cameras such as the Pentax 645Z, the dynamic range does not drop by 1 EV drop for each 1 EV increase in ISO.

We're pleased to see camera manufacturers implement this sort of behavior, as our ISO Invariance test has suggested that many cameras (such as the Nikon D750) could operate this way. Incidentally, many professional video cameras (like the ones from RED) have been operating in this manner for some time now, to maximize dynamic range of capture no matter what your ISO setting.

DPReview对富士GFX 50S动态范围测评：

GFX的操控和evf还有显示屏都让我很心水，焦平面快门试用性也更强些，X1D的镜间快门好处是用灯时优势明显，不过那声音。。。。。。有时候我都觉得它要坏掉了。X1D的电子快门我禁用了，按照我拍照习惯没什么用。用好手上机器是王道，每款机器都有长处短处。

其实都是用户，真没必要喜欢这个就诋毁那个。作为用户，其实对自己手上的机器的毛病才更恼火，X1D在最近两版固件没升级之前其实是很难用的（个人感受），新固件出来就好点。而且哈苏对X1D的说明很不详细，闪灯方案就说的很不清楚，写邮件打电话问也没什么人知道，最后只好靠试解决。接待态度很好，但解决问题弱，虽然在不断提高。

学习了，骨子里倾向X1D（比如对按钮的描述，GFX的满身旋钮真心非常便于操作，而且还带锁定按钮；不会出现误操作，在使用时又能迅速改变相机设置）

在X1D、GFX、645Z中63F2.8的画质最差，不用同一镜头进行测评机身，本身就不是同一标准。难道蓝拓就不知道？

说句实话，850和A7R3能同残疾中画幅比画质？

其实，就一相机，有多少钱，喜欢什么，就买什么

有些人，必要喜欢这个就诋毁别的，嗨。。。

这片文章就说，哈苏和富士都是有低通滤镜的。
本帖由 无忌论坛V3.1.0 iPhone6plus iOS11.3.1 客户端发布

看看蓝拓关于X1D和GFX-50S测评呗，还比较客观。https://irentals_cn/evaluations/214
本帖最后由 nikonovo 于 2018-6-13 21:15 编辑

谁说肯定不是5DSR的对手？GFX的分辨率和5DSR实拍对比：